Table 1

Summary of analyses. num, numerator; den, denominator.

experiment 1
sourceWilks' λFnum. d.f.den d.f.p
 block0.0986.161028<0.0001
 habitat complexity0.7542.282140.1384
 fishes0.18431.11214<0.0001
 habitat complexity×fishes0.861.142140.3482
sourced.f.SSMSFp
abundance
 block51339.3267.99.270.0004
 habitat complexity120.220.20.700.4167
 fishes11837.51837.563.56<0.0001
 habitat complexity×fishes132.732.71.130.3046
species richness
 block535.007.006.430.0022
 habitat complexity10.670.670.610.4461
 fishes154.0054.0049.59<0.0001
 habitat complexity×fishes10.000.0000.001.0000
experiment 2
sourceWilks' λFnum. d.f.den d.f.p
 block0.4080.946100.5068
 treatment0.153.954100.0355
contrast
 control versus Enneacanthus0.16113.03250.0104
 control versus Aphredoderus0.7400.88250.4717
Enneacanthus versus Aphredoderus0.2587.19250.0338
abundance
sourced.f.SSMSFp
 block3376.7125.60.740.5648
 treatment23004.71502.38.880.0161
contrastd.f.contrast SSMSFp
 control versus Enneacanthus127382738.016.180.0069
 control versus Aphredoderus1144.5144.50.850.3911
Enneacanthus versus Aphredoderus11624.51624.59.600.0212
species richness
sourced.f.SSMSFp
 block33.671.220.570.6542
 treatment271.1735.5816.640.0036
contrastd.f.contrast SSMSFp
 control versus Enneacanthus166.166.130.920.0014
 control versus Aphredoderus14.54.52.100.1971
Enneacanthus versus Aphredoderus136.136.116.890.0063