The penultimate sentence in the Results section contains an error. The sentence ‘ … declined 44%, 48% and 51% in the predator-free control … ’ should instead read ‘ … declined 44%, 48% and 51% in the high-richness treatment … ’. The correct sentence is given here in full:
Total dipteran oviposition declined 37% in response to dragonflies, 31% to damselflies and 27% to crayfish, relative to predator-free control, and declined 44%, 48% and 51% in the high-richness treatment relative to dragonfly, damselfly and crayfish treatments, respectively (table 1 and figure 1e).
This does not affect our results or conclusions. We apologize for any confusion caused.
- © 2017 The Author(s)
Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.